Post-treatment MRI Evaluation of Rectal Cancer

Authors: Renata Rocha de Almeida, Shanna Matalon MD, Daniel Souza, Leslie Lee, Stuart Silverman

Date: December 2021

Indication for neoadjuvant chemoradiation based on current NCCN guidelines:
       Stages II & III rectal cancer:

  • T3 (invades perirectal tissues) or T4 (invades adjacent organs), with any N disease,
  • N1 or N2 disease (at least one regional node/deposit), with any T disease,
  • Locally unresectable or medically inoperable tumors
  • Some low rectal tumors to allow for sphincter sparing resection

Current neoadjuvant chemotherapy options: 5-FU (infusional fluorouracil or oral capecitabine), oxaliplatin, +/- leucovorin, +/- irinotecan.

Neoadjuvant radiation:

  • Long course: ~50 Gy in 2528 fractions daily over 5-6 weeks + radiosensitizing chemotherapy (5-FU or capecitabine)
  • Short course: 25 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week (without chemotherapy)

While highest radiation dose is aimed at the rectum, other organs also receive high doses of radiation, such as the bladder, sacrum, pre-sacral fat, and prostate. Lower radiation fields may be used to encompass inguinal lymphadenopathy in the setting of low rectal tumors.

“Total neoadjuvant therapy” (TNT): All chemotherapy and radiation therapy given prior to surgery, with various permeations available. May be used for any of the following indications: any T4, any N2, tumors with threatened resection margin, and some low rectal tumors to allow for sphincter sparing resections.

Sequence Area of interest

Coronal T2
Large FOV (include upper abdomen)

Screen for metastases

Sagittal T2
Large FOV (pelvis only)

Prescribe oblique planes
Residual tumor location/distance from anal verge
Relationship to peritoneal reflection and other pelvic structures (i.e. uterus, prostate)

Short axis oblique T2*
High-resolution, small FOV

Assess primary tumor and lymph nodes

Long axis oblique T2/coronal T2
High-resolution, small FOV

Relationship of primary tumor to sphincter complex (low cancers)

DWI & ADC*
Large FOV (pelvis only)

Assess for persistent diffusion restriction of residual tumor
Localize lymph nodes
Reassessment of extramural venous invasion

Post contrast**
**Not required per Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) guidelines but may add value in assessing treatment response in non-mucinous tumors

Assess for persistent enhancement of residual tumor and heterogeneity of lymph nodes

*Key sequence to assess residual tumor

Prescribing oblique planes for angled T2-weighted images:

  • Provides optimal anatomic information
  • Reduces volume averaging
Tumor may be difficult to identify after treatment Look at the pre-treatment MRI to identify tumor location Draw oblique lines in the form of a “fishbone” based on the long and short axis of tumor

MRI Features of Treatment Response

Treatment response features on T2:

  • Decrease or resolution of T2-intermediate signal of viable tumor
  • Development of T2-hypointense fibrosis within the rectal wall or adjacent mesorectal fat (desmoplastic reaction)
  • Acellular mucin production: new or increased T2-hyperintense signal, similar to water

1. Fibrosis

  Initial Staging MRI – T2WI After Neoadjuvant Treatment MRI
– T2WI
Comment
Small / focal

Well-defined thin T2-hypointense signal (arrow)

Fibrosis confined to the rectal wall

Complete response

Semicircular/full-thickness 

Thick T2-hypointense signal (*)

Fibrosis involves the full thickness of rectal wall (*)

+/- Desmoplastic reaction (Arrow: T2-hypointense lines in mesorectal fat)

Usually complete response
Spiculated
Irregular spiculated tumor (*)

Spiculated T2-hypointense signal (arrow)

Desmoplastic reaction (arrowhead)

More frequent residual tumor

2. Mucinous degeneration in non-mucinous adenocarcinoma

Initial MRI – T2WI During Neoadjuvant Treatment – T2WI After Neoadjuvant Treatment – T2WI
Nodular T2-intermediate tumor signal (arrow) Replaced by T2-hyperintense signal of mucin (arrow) May be replaced by T2-hypointense scar (arrow)

3. Increased mucin in mucinous/signet ring cell cancers

Subtype Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment
Mucinous adenocarcinoma

T2-hyperintense signal reflects acellular /nonviable tumor
T2-intermediate signal reflects cellular/viable tumor
(Not shown)

Increased T2-hyperintense signal
Decreased/Resolved T2-intermediate signal
(Not shown)

Signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma

Treatment response features on DWI & ADC:

  • Resolved or decreased extent of restricted diffusion in tumor bed
  • Increased ADC signal and decreased DWI signal in tumor bed
  • Signal on DWI is similar to ADC (high-DWI & high-ADC OR low-ADC & low-DWI)

Non-mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Sequence Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment
T2
T2-intermediate tumor (*)
Increased signal in tumor bed (*) due to acellular mucin production
DWI
DWI hyperintense tumor (*)
Decreased signal in tumor bed (*) due to loss of cellularity
ADC
ADC hypointense tumor (*)
Increased signal in tumor bed (*) due to loss of cellularity

MRI Features of Residual Tumor

Residual tumor features on T2 and T1FSC+:

  • Persistent nodular-shaped T2-intermediate signal in tumor bed (in non-mucinous tumors)
  • Persistent T2-intermediate signal in submucosa (signet-ring cell subtype)
  • Early enhancement tumor bed ≥ than initial MRI
  • Unchanged or minimally decreased cellular mucin (in mucinous tumors)

1. Residual disease in a non-mucinous adenocarcinoma

Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment

T2-intermediate tumor (arrow)

Persistent nodular-shaped T2-intermediate signal in tumor bed (arrow)


Hyperenhancing tumor (*)

Early enhancement tumor bed (arrow) > than initial MRI

2. Residual disease in a mucinous asdenocarcinoma

Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment

T2-hyperintense tumor (arrows)
Internal intermediate signal (*)

Decreased T2-hyperintense mucinous tumor (arrows)

Persistent T2-intermediate signal (*) of cellular mucin

3. Residual disease in a signet ring cell adenocarcinoma

Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment

T2-intermediate tumor in submucosa (*)
Improved but persistent T2-intermediate signal of cellular mucin in mucinous tumor

Reassessment of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM)

Reassessment of mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement

  • Resolved MRF involvement: Development of clear fat plane (≥ 2mm) ± desmoplastic reaction between tumor and MRF
  • Persistent MRF involvement: Persistent T2-intermediate or T2-hyperintense signal infiltration of MRF
  • Indeterminate MRF involvement: Diffuse fibrotic (T2-hypointense) infiltration of MRF
Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment

T2-intermediate tumor involves MRF (arrows)

New fat plane (arrow) with desmoplastic reaction (arrowhead) between tumor bed and MRF

Resolved MRF Involvement

T2-intermediate tumor involves MRF (arrow)

Persistent T2-intermediate signal of tumor along MRF (arrow)

Persistent MRF Involvement

T2-intermediate tumor involves MRF (arrow)

Thick T2-hypointense signal of fibrosis along MRF (arrow)

Indeterminate MRF Involvement

Reassessment of sphincter complex in low rectal cancers

  • Allow sphincter-sparing surgery: Tumor involves up to the intersphincteric fat but does not involve external sphincter; > 2 cm from anal verge
  • Does not allow sphincter-sparing surgery: Tumor invades external sphincter; < 1-2 cm from anal verge

Reassessment of extramural vascular invasion

Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment

T2-intermediate signal along vessels (arrow)

Resolved T2-intermediate signal along mesorectal vessels

Replacement by linear T2-hypointense fibrosis (arrow)

Resolved extramural vascular invasion (EMVI)


T2-intermediate signal along vessels (arrow)

Improved but persistent nodular T2-intermediate signal along mesorectal vessels (arrow)

Persistent extramural vascular invasion (EMVI)

Locoregional nodes (N1/2): Mesorectal, superior rectal, obturator (posterior to external iliac vessels), and internal iliac stations (and inguinal nodes, sometimes considered locoregional if a low rectal cancer involving anal canal).

  • “Lateral lymph nodes”: Refers to obturator and internal iliac stations, which are not removed with standard surgical resection; it is important to report these separately as at some institutions, a lateral lymph node dissection will also be performed.

Nonlocoregional nodes (M1): external iliac (anterior or lateral to external iliac vessels), common iliac, and paraaortic, and inguinal stations (if mid or high rectal cancer)

MRI Features of Nodal Treatment Response

  • Disappearance or decreased size to < 5mm short axis
  • Replacement by T2-hypointense fibrosis
  • New/Increased T2-hyperintense signal of acellular mucin
Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment Comment

Enlarged and heterogeneous mesorectal (white arrow) and internal iliac nodes (black arrow)

Complete disappearance of mesorectal and internal iliac nodes  

Replacement by T2-hypointense fibrosis (arrow)


Enlarged & T2 hyperintense superior rectal nodes (arrows) with internal T2-intermediate signal (*)

New/Increased T2-hyperintense signal of acellular mucin (arrow)

Decreased size (arrowhead)

MRI Features of Residual Tumor in Nodes

  • Size ≥ 5 mm in short axis (**only feature considered by SAR/ESGAR panels)
  • Persistent T2-intermediate signal, irregular contour, heterogeneous signal
Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment

Enlarged lymph nodes with T2-intermediate signal and irregular contour in the obturator (white arrow) and internal iliac (black arrow) stations. O=Obturator muscle


Most nodes have decreased size but there is a persistent node with ≥ 5 mm in short axis and irregular contour (white arrow). O=Obturator muscle

Pseudotumor

  • Pseudotumor is a mucosal edema after radiation involving the rectal wall not previously involved by tumor, appearing as T2-hyperintense signal
Initial MRI – T2WI After Neoadjuvant Treatment – T2WI

T2-intermediate tumor invading the mesorectal fat at 12 o’clock (arrow) with heterogeneous tumor deposits (arrowheads)

T2-hypointense fibrosis in rectal wall at 12 o’clock (arrow). New adjacent T2-hyperintense masslike thickening posteriorly (*) (Pseudotumor)

Persistent restricted diffusion versus T2-shine-through OR T2-dark-through

  • T2-shine-through and T2-dark-through are seen in tumor response
    • T2-shine-through (hyperintense signal on DWI and ADC) happens due to decreased cellularity at the tumor bed
    • T2-dark-through (hypointense signal on DWI and ADC) happens due to increased cellularity of dense fibrosis replacing the tumor bed
  • Tip: Equal (low-low or high-high) signal in DWI and ADC means response rather than viable tumor

T2-shine-through in a patient with a complete response

Sequence Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment
T2WI
Circumferential T2-intermediate tumor (*)

Persistent T2-intermediate signal in tumor bed (*) raises question of residual tumor

DWI


DWI hyperintense tumor (*)

Persistent DWI hyperintense signal (*) in tumor bed also raises question of residual tumor
ADC
ADC hypointense tumor (*)

New ADC hyperintense signal in tumor bed due to T2-shine-through and treatment response

T2-dark-through in a patient with complete response

Sequence Initial MRI After Neoadjuvant Treatment
T2WI
T2-intermediate tumor (*)

New T2-hypointense signal in tumor bed (*) due to fibrosis

ADC


ADC hypointense tumor (*)

Persistent ADC hypointense signal in tumor bed (*) raises question of residual tumor

DWI


DWI hyperintense tumor (*)

New DWI hypointense signal in tumor bed (*) due to T2-dark-through

Fistulas:
Tumor-to-bladder (arrow)

Proctitis, Enteritis, Colitis:
Enterocolitis (arrows)

Insufficiency Fracture:
Sacrum (arrows)

Pre-sacral and mesorectal edema:

Other (not shown): Avascular necrosis of femoral heads, Cystitis

  1. Almeida RR, Souza D, Matalon SA, Hornick JL, Lee LK, Silverman SG. Rectal MRI after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: a pictorial guide to interpretation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jul;46(7):3044-3057.
  2. Park S, Joon Seok Lim M, Lee J, et al. Rectal Mucinous adenocarcinoma: MR Imaging Assessment of Response to Concurrent Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy—A Hypothesis- generating Study. Radiology. 2017;285(285):124–133.
  3. Lambregts DMJ, Pizzi AD, Lahaye MJ, et al. A pattern-based approach combining tumor morphology on MRI with distinct signal patterns on diffusion-weighted imaging to assess response of rectal tumors after chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum.
  4. 2018;61:328–337.
  5. Lambregts DMJ, Boellaard TN, Beets-Tan RGH. Response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer using modern MR imaging: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2019;10.
  6. Kalis KR, Enzerra MD, Paspulati RM. MRI Evaluation of the Response of Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.
  7. Radiographics. 2019;39:538–556.
  8. Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. American Joint Committee on Cancer. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 252–254.
  9. Gollub MJ, Arya S, Beets-Tan RG, et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43:2893–2902.
  10. Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:1465–1475.
Scroll to Top